In a surprising move, the House has voted against a bipartisan initiative aimed at enabling new parents to participate in voting via proxy. This decision raises questions about representation and the challenges faced by working families.
In a narrow 215-210 vote on Wednesday, the U.S. House of Representatives rejected a bipartisan bill that would have permitted new parents to cast votes via proxy during the first six months after childbirth or adoption. The failed measure, championed by both Democratic and Republican working parents, highlights ongoing tensions between modern family needs and congressional tradition.
The proposed rule change would have aligned the House with legislatures in 11 countries—including the UK, Australia, and New Zealand—that currently allow parental proxy voting. Supporters argued the measure addressed a critical representation gap: approximately 5% of House members give birth or adopt during each congressional session, while dozens more staffers face similar challenges.
“This wasn’t about partisan advantage—it was about ensuring all constituents maintain equal representation during major life transitions,” said Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA), who co-sponsored the bill after giving birth in 2022. Internal House data shows new parents missed 83 recorded votes last session due to parental leave.
Opponents, however, maintained that proxy voting erodes accountability. “Members are elected to show up and vote in person,” argued House Rules Committee Chairman Tom Cole (R-OK). “If we start making exceptions, where does it end?”
A 2023 Congressional Research Service report reveals stark disparities:
Dr. Elaine Kamarck, a Brookings Institution governance scholar, notes the contradiction: “Congress routinely mandates parental accommodations for private employers yet exempts itself from those same standards. This vote perpetuates a system where young parents effectively penalize their constituents by taking legally protected leave.”
The debate reignites questions about congressional modernization. The House briefly allowed universal proxy voting during COVID-19—a system used for 1,100 votes before being rescinded in 2021. Supporters hoped the parental provision would gain traction as a limited, compassionate exception.
“Proxy voting exists for medical emergencies and military service,” noted former Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL). “Given that childbirth carries higher health risks than prostate surgery—which qualifies for proxies—the opposition seems more about tradition than logic.”
However, procedural experts warn proxy systems create logistical headaches. A 2022 Harvard study found proxy votes required 37% more time to process and increased parliamentary challenges by 22% in state legislatures that permit them.
Advocates plan to reintroduce the measure as a standalone bill rather than a rules change, potentially forcing recorded votes that could politically vulnerable members. Meanwhile, the Congressional Progressive Caucus is exploring alternative solutions like:
As Rep. Jacobs told reporters after the vote: “When 25% of women in Congress have had babies while serving, but our rules pretend that never happens, we’re not just failing parents—we’re failing democracy.” With 18 members currently expecting children or adopting, this issue shows no signs of disappearing.
Contact your representative to share your perspective on congressional voting reforms and parental leave policies.
See more BBC Express News
Discover why Crimea is a key issue in Russia-Ukraine tensions and its impact on geopolitical…
Explore Ed Martin's alleged ties to a Nazi sympathizer and the implications for political transparency.
George Santos faces serious accusations from a Navy veteran over emotional manipulation and alleged theft…
Trump's election reform faces a major setback as a court ruling disrupts key changes.
Trump faces a diplomatic challenge as Putin remains silent on peace efforts during Witkoff's visit.
Pam Bondi reacts to the arrest of a Wisconsin judge in a controversial immigration case.