A prominent Member of the European Parliament suggests that President Macron bears significant responsibility for France's ongoing struggles in Africa. This assertion raises questions about France's foreign policy and its impact on diplomatic relations.
Recent remarks by a prominent Member of the European Parliament have sparked a heated debate on the role of French President Emmanuel Macron in shaping France’s current diplomatic and economic challenges in Africa. These challenges, which have become increasingly pronounced in recent years, have drawn global attention and raised questions about the future of French foreign policy on the continent. Is Macron truly the architect of France’s African troubles, or is the situation more complex? This article explores the underlying causes of France’s ongoing struggles in Africa, analyzing the accusations directed at Macron, and placing them within the broader historical, political, and socio-economic context.
Emmanuel Macron’s presidency has been marked by a delicate balancing act in Africa, one shaped by both the historical ties between France and its former colonies and the evolving realities of modern international relations. The former French colonies in Africa, particularly in the Sahel region, have faced rising instability due to factors such as terrorism, political unrest, and economic stagnation. The question of France’s involvement in these countries has been under scrutiny, especially given the role the country has historically played in the region’s political and military affairs.
One of the key accusations against Macron is that his foreign policy decisions have exacerbated tensions in the region rather than improving diplomatic relations. Critics argue that his approach to military intervention, particularly in the Sahel, has been one of the primary drivers of instability. Under Macron, France continued its military operations in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, initially launched under his predecessor François Hollande, to combat Islamist militant groups. While these interventions were justified as a means of stabilizing the region and protecting French interests, they have faced significant backlash from local populations who see the French presence as a form of neo-imperialism.
To understand the accusations against Macron, it is essential to look at the historical context of France’s relationship with Africa. France’s colonial legacy in Africa, particularly in West and Central Africa, is a complex and painful chapter. French colonial rule, which lasted until the mid-20th century, left deep scars on the political and social fabric of many African nations. The aftermath of decolonization has often seen France maintain a strong influence over its former colonies through both political alliances and economic ties, a phenomenon often referred to as Françafrique.
The term Françafrique describes a network of political, economic, and military relationships between France and its former colonies, often marked by a lack of transparency and accountability. This network has been criticized for perpetuating corruption, undermining democratic institutions, and fostering authoritarian regimes in Africa. Macron inherited this controversial legacy, and his attempts to distance France from the more nefarious aspects of Françafrique have been met with mixed results.
In his early years in office, Macron sought to position himself as the architect of a “new” French approach to Africa—one that would be more respectful, more inclusive, and more focused on development and partnership. During a speech in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, in 2017, Macron expressed regret for the colonial era and vowed to build a “more equal” relationship with Africa. This message was seen as a departure from the paternalistic attitude that had defined French policy in the past.
However, Macron’s vision of a new partnership was quickly put to the test. The Sahel region, in particular, has become a major point of contention. Despite calls for greater local involvement and more sustainable security solutions, France’s continued military presence in the region has been seen by many as an extension of the same colonial mindset that Macron pledged to move away from. Protests against French forces have intensified, and anti-French sentiment has been rising, especially in countries like Mali, where the government has recently requested the withdrawal of French troops.
As President Macron navigates these complex dynamics, his policies have faced increasing opposition from local populations and political leaders. In countries like Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, the perceived failure of France’s military interventions to stabilize the region has led to a surge in anti-French sentiment. This resentment is not only due to the presence of French troops but also stems from the belief that France is pursuing its own interests at the expense of Africa’s stability and sovereignty.
In Mali, for example, the coup in 2021 ousted the pro-French government, and the new military junta has sought to distance the country from French influence, calling for the withdrawal of French forces. The situation in Burkina Faso and Niger is similarly marked by growing frustration with French involvement, with protests and calls for the departure of French troops becoming increasingly common.
Macron has tried to counter this by emphasizing France’s commitment to security and counterterrorism efforts, but the reality on the ground suggests that the French military presence is becoming a political liability. The challenge for Macron, and for future French leaders, will be to find a way to address the security issues in the Sahel while respecting the growing calls for African sovereignty and autonomy.
In addition to the political and military dimensions, France’s economic involvement in Africa remains a contentious issue. France has significant economic interests in Africa, particularly in countries rich in natural resources such as oil, gas, and minerals. French companies like TotalEnergies and Areva have long operated in Africa, often with the backing of the French government. This economic relationship, though beneficial to both parties, has been criticized for fostering dependency and inequality.
Macron has pledged to refocus French aid to Africa on long-term development projects, including education, health, and infrastructure. His government has also supported efforts to reduce Africa’s debt burden. However, critics argue that French businesses continue to dominate key sectors in Africa, perpetuating an economic system that often benefits France at the expense of local economies. Furthermore, accusations of corruption and exploitation persist, fueling the perception that French interests are more aligned with maintaining the status quo than promoting genuine development.
The question of whether Macron can change the trajectory of French-African relations remains uncertain. His administration has already made some attempts to pivot toward a more modern and cooperative relationship, but these efforts have been met with mixed results. The growing anti-French sentiment and the political turmoil in the Sahel suggest that more drastic reforms may be needed to repair France’s image in Africa.
Some analysts argue that Macron should pursue a more multilateral approach, working with the African Union and other international partners to address the region’s challenges. Others suggest that France should reconsider its military presence in the Sahel altogether, instead focusing on supporting local peacebuilding efforts and strengthening African-led solutions to regional security problems.
France’s struggles in Africa are not just a matter of national interest; they have broader implications for European foreign policy as a whole. The EU has long viewed Africa as a key partner in areas such as trade, migration, and security. As one of the leading European powers with a strong historical presence on the continent, France’s ability to shape the future of Franco-African relations will significantly impact the EU’s broader strategy toward Africa.
If France’s relationship with its former colonies continues to deteriorate, it could undermine European influence in Africa and pave the way for other global powers, such as China and Russia, to expand their foothold on the continent. This could lead to a reconfiguration of Africa’s international relationships and shift the balance of power in global geopolitics.
In conclusion, while it may be too simplistic to lay the blame for France’s African challenges squarely at the feet of Emmanuel Macron, his presidency has undeniably played a central role in shaping the current state of affairs. The accusations against Macron suggest that France’s traditional methods of engaging with Africa—both politically and economically—are no longer viable in the modern context. The path forward for France lies in rethinking its approach to Africa, focusing on genuine partnerships that respect African sovereignty and prioritize long-term development over short-term political or military gains.
For Macron, this may require a radical shift in policy—a move away from military interventions and economic dominance toward more collaborative and sustainable forms of engagement. Only time will tell whether such a shift is possible, but it is clear that the stakes are high, not just for France, but for the entire European Union and its future relationship with Africa.
For more on the shifting dynamics of European-African relations, see our article on France’s changing role in global geopolitics.
For recent developments on the ground in the Sahel region, visit BBC’s coverage of the Sahel crisis.
See more BBC Express News
Israeli military's latest Gaza evacuation orders signal heightened conflict and humanitarian concerns.
Explore how medical rulings impact police accountability in arrest-related deaths.
David Hogg confronts backlash over his inquiry into Democratic outreach to young men.
Israel faces rising tensions with Turkey over Syria, highlighting urgent geopolitical concerns in the region.
Kamala Harris inspires students to stay engaged in political advocacy after the election.
Discover the fate of the Abrams tank in Russia's Kursk Region and its implications for…