As geopolitical influences evolve, Bashar al-Assad's grip on Syria appears increasingly tenuous. With Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah seemingly easing their support, questions arise about the future stability of the region and the implications for its citizens.
The prolonged Syrian civil war, now entering its 13th year, has witnessed dramatic shifts in the geopolitical landscape surrounding Bashar al-Assad’s regime. Once seen as firmly entrenched with the backing of Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah, Assad’s control over Syria is increasingly being questioned as his key allies begin to recalibrate their support. This evolving dynamic has profound implications for both the stability of the region and the daily lives of its citizens, whose future remains uncertain amidst the changing political tides.
The Syrian government, which once appeared on the brink of collapse, has managed to retain power through a combination of ruthless military campaigns and external intervention. However, with Assad’s traditional backers showing signs of easing their direct support, questions about the durability of his regime and the long-term future of Syria are gaining prominence in geopolitical discussions. This article delves into the current state of Assad’s control, the shifting alliances in the region, and what this could mean for the Syrian people and the broader Middle East.
For much of the conflict, Bashar al-Assad’s regime depended heavily on the military and financial support of two major powers: Russia and Iran. These alliances have been crucial in maintaining Assad’s hold over large portions of Syrian territory. However, recent developments indicate that the unshakable bond between these powers and the Assad regime may not be as secure as it once was.
Russia’s involvement in Syria began in earnest in 2015, when Moscow intervened to prevent the collapse of Assad’s regime. The Russian military provided air support, and Russian advisers helped reorganize and strengthen the Syrian army. Over the years, Russia has also used its influence in the United Nations and other international forums to block resolutions that could threaten Assad’s government.
However, as the war has evolved and Russia faces its own set of challenges—including its ongoing conflict in Ukraine—there are signs that Russia is scaling back its direct involvement in Syria. Moscow’s priorities now seem to lie more in managing its strategic interests in the Middle East rather than providing full-scale military assistance to Assad. Some analysts argue that Russia’s interest in Syria is shifting from support for Assad’s regime to securing broader regional goals, such as maintaining access to military bases and leveraging its presence as a counterbalance to U.S. influence in the region.
One key indicator of this shift is the decreased frequency of Russian airstrikes and the scaling back of military operations that previously targeted rebel-held areas. Furthermore, Russia has increasingly focused on facilitating dialogue between Assad’s government and regional players, including Arab states, signaling a possible diplomatic thaw that might not necessarily hinge on Assad’s survival as the sole ruler of Syria.
Like Russia, Iran has played a vital role in keeping Assad in power, providing military assistance, economic aid, and political backing. Iran’s elite Quds Force, along with Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon, has been at the forefront of military campaigns that secured key areas of Syria for Assad. However, Iran’s commitment to Assad is being questioned in light of changing regional priorities.
In recent months, Iran has been grappling with internal economic challenges, as well as growing pressure from Western sanctions. These factors have contributed to Tehran’s reduced capacity to invest heavily in military operations abroad. The shift in Iran’s focus is also reflected in its approach to Syria. Instead of a full-scale military engagement, Iran has increasingly relied on local militias and proxies to maintain its presence in Syria.
Hezbollah, which has long been a staunch ally of Assad, also faces its own dilemmas. The organization is stretched thin due to its involvement in various theaters of conflict, including its support for the Houthis in Yemen and its increasing focus on the situation in Lebanon. As a result, Hezbollah’s support for Assad has been less robust, further signaling that Assad’s external backers may be reconsidering their commitment to his survival.
As Assad’s once unshakable alliances begin to wane, other regional actors are seeking to capitalize on the potential power vacuum in Syria. The shifting geopolitical landscape has sparked a realignment of alliances, with countries such as Turkey, Israel, and even some Arab states reconsidering their positions in relation to Syria.
Turkey, which has supported various opposition groups in Syria, has also undergone a change in its approach toward Assad. With the Assad regime regaining control over much of the country’s territory, Turkey faces increasing pressure to adjust its stance, particularly regarding its Kurdish adversaries. Ankara views Kurdish forces in northern Syria—who have received U.S. support—as a significant threat to its own security, especially in light of the ongoing tensions between Turkey and the Kurdish PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party).
Turkey’s strategy has shifted toward engagement with Russia and even direct dialogue with Assad’s regime. While President Erdogan has publicly maintained his opposition to Assad, there are signs of a pragmatic rapprochement, particularly as Turkey seeks to address the growing issue of Syrian refugees within its borders. A change in Turkey’s position could further isolate Assad’s remaining backers and create new opportunities for diplomacy, though the situation remains fluid.
One of the most significant developments in recent months is the gradual normalization of relations between Syria and several Arab states. After nearly a decade of isolation, Syria’s return to the Arab League and the resumption of diplomatic ties with countries like the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain mark a dramatic shift in regional politics.
For many Arab nations, the desire to reintegrate Syria into the regional fold stems from economic and geopolitical considerations. The rebuilding of Syria’s war-torn infrastructure presents lucrative opportunities, and many Arab states view Assad’s return as a way to counterbalance the influence of Iran and Turkey in the region. However, these moves are also driven by a broader desire to stabilize the region, especially as the Middle East faces rising tensions in other areas such as Iraq and Yemen.
However, despite these diplomatic overtures, these Arab states are also cautious, recognizing that Assad’s control over Syria is no longer as solid as it once was. There are growing concerns over the economic viability of Syria, the continued instability in certain regions, and the influence of external actors like Iran and Russia.
While the geopolitical chess game plays out on the international stage, the people of Syria continue to bear the brunt of the conflict. Years of war have left millions dead, displaced, or living in extreme poverty. The shifting international alliances may have profound implications for these civilians, many of whom are already struggling to survive in the midst of a collapsed economy and ongoing violence.
As Assad’s external support wanes, the Syrian government may find it increasingly difficult to maintain its hold over the country without resorting to even more oppressive tactics. However, the prospect of any political transition remains distant, with no clear path toward a peaceful resolution. Humanitarian aid remains limited, and the rebuilding process is slow and uneven, with many parts of the country still under the control of rival factions.
The crumbling illusion of Bashar al-Assad’s unchallenged control over Syria reflects broader shifts in the Middle East’s geopolitical landscape. As Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah recalibrate their involvement, and regional players like Turkey and Arab states reconsider their positions, the future of Syria remains uncertain. While Assad may cling to power for the time being, his grip on the country is slipping. The people of Syria, who have endured more than a decade of war, remain the ultimate victims of this shifting dynamic. Until a broader regional and international consensus emerges, the road to stability for Syria and its people will remain fraught with challenges.
For more information on the latest developments in Syria, visit BBC News on Syria.
To learn about the broader implications of shifting Middle Eastern alliances, see our detailed analysis here.
See more BBC Express News
Israeli military's latest Gaza evacuation orders signal heightened conflict and humanitarian concerns.
Explore how medical rulings impact police accountability in arrest-related deaths.
David Hogg confronts backlash over his inquiry into Democratic outreach to young men.
Israel faces rising tensions with Turkey over Syria, highlighting urgent geopolitical concerns in the region.
Kamala Harris inspires students to stay engaged in political advocacy after the election.
Discover the fate of the Abrams tank in Russia's Kursk Region and its implications for…