The ongoing civil war in Syria has been a complex and multi-faceted conflict, pitting President Bashar al-Assad’s regime against a variety of insurgent and rebel forces, as well as foreign powers with competing interests. While Assad’s government has regained control over large parts of the country, the resurgence of insurgent groups raises concerns about the future stability of his regime. As Syria enters a new phase of its protracted civil war, experts are warning that the possibility of a renewed insurgency could threaten the fragile peace Assad has managed to consolidate. This article explores the current threats to Assad’s rule, analyzes the potential for renewed insurgencies, and examines the broader implications for governance and stability in Syria.
The Resurgence of Insurgency: A Growing Threat to Assad’s Rule
As the Syrian conflict has evolved, so too has the nature of the insurgency. Initially, opposition groups were united under a broad banner of anti-Assad sentiment, but over time, the insurgency splintered into various factions, including both secular and Islamist groups, as well as Kurdish forces. However, a new wave of insurgent activity is starting to challenge the regime’s efforts to stabilize the country, particularly in the northwest and eastern regions, where rebel groups have managed to regroup and resupply despite Assad’s military victories.
Factors Contributing to the Resurgence
Several factors contribute to the rise of a potential renewed insurgency in Syria:
- Discontent among local populations: The Assad regime’s tactics of collective punishment, mass displacement, and authoritarian governance have alienated many Syrians, particularly in regions where the government has regained control. This has created a fertile ground for insurgent recruitment.
- Continued foreign intervention: Despite Assad’s successes, foreign actors such as Turkey, the U.S., and Iran continue to play a significant role in the Syrian conflict. These external powers support different factions, thereby prolonging the war and preventing complete stabilization.
- Economic instability: The country’s economic collapse, fueled by Western sanctions and the devastation of the war, has led to widespread poverty, unemployment, and food insecurity. This environment can foster resentment and push more people towards insurgent groups, who promise an alternative to Assad’s regime.
- Islamic State’s persistent presence: Despite being largely defeated in Syria, remnants of ISIS continue to operate in the country’s eastern desert regions. These militants have established covert networks that could potentially evolve into a more significant insurgent force.
Impact of Renewed Insurgency on Assad’s Regime
The potential for a renewed insurgency in Syria is not just a military challenge for Assad, but also a political and social dilemma. A resurgence of violence could destabilize the tenuous balance that has been achieved in recent years and undermine the fragile peace efforts that are in place.
Military Implications
From a military perspective, a renewed insurgency would force Assad to divert critical resources back into counterinsurgency operations. While his military has benefitted from support from Russia and Iran, it remains overstretched in many areas. The Syrian army’s ability to suppress insurgent activities in new hotspots would be severely tested, especially in areas where logistical support is limited.
The Syrian government’s dependence on irregular militia groups, such as Hezbollah and local Shia militias, also introduces new dynamics. These groups, while effective in certain military operations, are often less motivated to engage in a protracted counterinsurgency campaign, particularly when their primary interests align with specific geographic regions or sectarian goals.
Political Ramifications
Politically, a resurgence of insurgent violence could undermine Assad’s claims of legitimacy. International pressure for a political solution remains strong, particularly from the United Nations and European powers. If insurgency-related violence intensifies, foreign governments may use it as a pretext to demand further political concessions from Assad. These could include measures to include opposition groups in governance, which would dilute the regime’s power.
The political legitimacy of Assad’s government has already been a point of contention since the beginning of the conflict. While Russia and Iran have backed him, key global powers such as the United States and many European Union states continue to refuse to recognize Assad as the legitimate leader of Syria. A resurgence of insurgent activity may provide these nations with additional justification for supporting opposition groups or increasing sanctions on the Assad regime.
The Role of Foreign Actors in Prolonging the Conflict
While the focus in Syria often remains on Assad’s actions, the role of foreign actors is critical to understanding the prolonged nature of the conflict. The presence of foreign powers has complicated the situation and created a multi-layered battlefront that goes beyond the initial rebellion against Assad’s rule.
Russia’s Continued Support
Russia has been one of Assad’s strongest allies since the beginning of the conflict, providing significant military and diplomatic support. The Russian military has played a pivotal role in turning the tide of the war in Assad’s favor. However, Russia’s interests in Syria are not entirely aligned with Assad’s long-term goals. Moscow’s primary concern is maintaining its strategic military presence in the Mediterranean, particularly its naval base in Tartus and its airbase in Latakia. As such, Russia has shown little inclination to become embroiled in a lengthy counterinsurgency campaign that could threaten its own objectives.
Iran’s Strategic Interests
Iran’s support for Assad is also driven by its desire to maintain influence in the region and safeguard its access to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Iranian-backed forces have helped secure key areas for the Assad regime, but the increasing instability in Syria could lead to Iran reassessing its involvement. If insurgent groups manage to gain traction in areas of strategic importance to Iran, it could prompt Tehran to adjust its strategy, potentially leading to more direct military involvement or support for more localized militias.
U.S. and Turkish Involvement
The U.S. and Turkey have been key actors in Syria, though often on opposite sides. While the U.S. has focused on countering ISIS and supporting Kurdish forces in the northeast, Turkey has been involved in combating Kurdish militias it views as terrorist organizations. Both countries have been instrumental in shaping the direction of the insurgency, with U.S. support enabling Kurdish groups like the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to act as a check on Assad’s expansion. Turkey, meanwhile, has supported Syrian opposition factions to establish a buffer zone along its southern border. The ongoing support from these external powers to various groups creates a fractured landscape that ensures the conflict is far from over.
Broader Implications for Regional Stability
A renewed insurgency in Syria would have profound implications for the broader Middle East. Syria’s neighbors—Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq, and Israel—are all directly impacted by the country’s instability, and any resurgence of insurgent activity could fuel further regional tensions.
- Turkey: Turkey’s military involvement in Syria, particularly in the northwest, is driven by its desire to prevent Kurdish forces from establishing an autonomous region along its border. If insurgent violence escalates, Turkey could be forced to intervene more directly, exacerbating tensions with Assad and his allies.
- Lebanon: The ongoing conflict in Syria has had direct implications for Lebanon, particularly in the form of the Hezbollah-led insurgency. A resurgence of violence in Syria could destabilize Lebanon further, as Hezbollah is likely to become more involved in Syrian operations.
- Iraq: The ongoing presence of ISIS remnants in both Syria and Iraq creates a shared security challenge for both countries. A renewed insurgency in Syria could lead to cross-border insurgency activities, increasing the risk of violence in Iraq.
- Israel: Israel has closely monitored developments in Syria, particularly the influence of Iranian-backed forces near its borders. A resurgence of insurgency or instability could lead to more frequent Israeli airstrikes in Syria to prevent the expansion of Iranian influence.
Conclusion: A Fragile Peace or a New Conflict?
The future of Syria remains uncertain. While Assad has regained control over large swaths of the country, the threat of a renewed insurgency looms large. The convergence of domestic grievances, foreign interference, and persistent economic and social instability creates a volatile environment where insurgency groups can easily capitalize on growing discontent. A renewed insurgency could destabilize the already fragile peace that Assad’s regime has worked hard to consolidate.
Looking ahead, Syria’s future will be shaped by the interplay of these complex factors, and the ability of both internal and external actors to navigate the challenges will determine whether the country can finally achieve long-term peace or descend into a new cycle of conflict.
For more on the dynamics of the Syrian conflict, visit BBC’s Middle East Coverage and stay updated on the latest developments.
See more BBC Express News